Watch.co
Comparison · updated November 2026

Rolex Daytona vs Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch

Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001 vs Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001, compared on the specs each brand publishes.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Picks and verdicts come from brand-published specs, not paid placement. How we make money.

The short answer

The two most famous chronographs, compared on the specs Rolex and Omega publish.

  • Case size: the Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001 is 2 mm larger (42 mm vs 40 mm).
  • Water resistance: the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001 is 50 m more (100 m vs 50 m).
  • Power reserve: the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001 is 22 hours longer (72 h vs 50 h).
  • Price: the Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001 lists for $9,500 less in the US ($7,400 vs $16,900).
  • Movement: Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001 has Automatic; Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001 has Manual-wind.

Side-by-side specs

Rolex Daytona vs Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch: specs side by side
SpecRolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001
Case diameter40 mm42 mm
ThicknessNot published by Rolex13.18 mm
Lug-to-lugNot published by Rolex47.5 mm
Lug widthNot published by Rolex20 mm
Calibre4131Omega 3861
MovementAutomaticManual-wind
Power reserve72 h50 h
Water resistance100 m50 m
CrystalSapphireAcrylic
Case materialStainless steelStainless steel
Ships onBraceletFabric strap
WeightNot published by Rolex91 g
US list price$16,900 (US list)$7,400 (US list)
DialWhite, black counter ringsBlack
CertificationCOSC chronometer (Rolex Superlative Chronometer)METAS Master Chronometer
ChronographYesYes
StatusIn productionIn production
Suits wrists of about
our sizing guide
16.0–17.9 cm16.8–18.7 cm

Specs summarised in our own words from the brand's product pages: 126500LN-0001 source (checked 3 Nov 2026) 310.32.42.50.01.001 source (checked 3 Nov 2026). "Not published" means the brand page we checked doesn't list it, so we leave it blank rather than guess.

All the differences

Wrist fit

Lug-to-lug decides overhang more than diameter does. Enter your wrist to see how each one should wear.

  • Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001 –
  • Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001 –

Same rule of thumb as Watch Finder: case diameter of about 23.5% of your wrist circumference (−2 mm to +2.5 mm), and lug-to-lug no longer than about 29% of it plus 1 mm. A guide, not a rule; flat or round wrists differ.

Strap fit

Rolex doesn't publish the lug width of the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001, so measure it before buying a strap. The Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001 has 20 mm lugs. Size charts: Rolex size chart · Omega lug width chart.

Which should you buy?

Smaller wristsRolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001

It is the more compact case on paper (40 mm across). Our sizing guide puts it at about 16.0–17.9 cm.

Lower budgetOmega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001

It has the lower US list price, $7,400, a $9,500 difference.

Swimming and divingRolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001

It has the higher water-resistance rating: 100 m vs 50 m.

Leaving it off for a weekendRolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001

It has the longer published power reserve: 72 h.

Prices and where to buy

Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001$16,900 (US list)Search AmazonFull specs
Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001$7,400 (US list)Search AmazonFull specs

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Amazon links are paid links. How we make money.

More: All Rolex Cosmograph Daytona references · All Omega Speedmaster references.

Questions

Which is bigger, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001 or the Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001?

Per the brands, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001 is 40 mm across and the Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001 is 42 mm.

Which is cheaper?

The Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001, at a US list price of $7,400 vs $16,900 when we checked.

Which is more water-resistant?

Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 126500LN-0001: 100 m. Omega Moonwatch 310.32.42.50.01.001: 50 m.

Have you tested these watches?

No. This comparison uses brand-published specs and our own analysis of them, not hands-on testing.

Not sure? Try Watch Finder →

Watch.co is independent and not affiliated with any brand. We haven't handled these watches for this page: everything here comes from brand-published specs and our own analysis. Brand names are used only to identify products.