Watch.co
Comparison · updated November 2026

Rolex Datejust 41 vs Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra

Rolex Datejust 126334-0001 vs Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003, compared on the specs each brand publishes.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Picks and verdicts come from brand-published specs, not paid placement. How we make money.

The short answer

Two everyday steel watches from Geneva and Biel, compared at around 41 mm.

  • Water resistance: the Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003 is 50 m more (150 m vs 100 m).
  • Power reserve: the Rolex Datejust 126334-0001 is 10 hours longer (70 h vs 60 h).
  • Price: the Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003 lists for $4,950 less in the US ($6,700 vs $11,650).
  • Calibre: Rolex Datejust 126334-0001 has 3235; Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003 has Omega 8900.
  • Certification: Rolex Datejust 126334-0001 has COSC chronometer (Rolex Superlative Chronometer); Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003 has METAS Master Chronometer.

Side-by-side specs

Rolex Datejust 41 vs Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra: specs side by side
SpecRolex Datejust 126334-0001Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003
Case diameter41 mm41 mm
ThicknessNot published by Rolex13.2 mm
Lug-to-lugNot published by Rolex47.9 mm
Lug widthNot published by Rolex20 mm
Calibre3235Omega 8900
MovementAutomaticAutomatic
Power reserve70 h60 h
Water resistance100 m150 m
CrystalSapphireSapphire
Case materialSteel and goldStainless steel
Ships onBraceletLeather strap
WeightNot published by Rolex95 g
US list price$11,650 (US list)$6,700 (US list)
DialBright blueBlue
CertificationCOSC chronometer (Rolex Superlative Chronometer)METAS Master Chronometer
StatusIn productionIn production
Suits wrists of about
our sizing guide
16.4–18.3 cm16.4–18.3 cm

Specs summarised in our own words from the brand's product pages: 126334-0001 source (checked 3 Nov 2026) 220.13.41.21.03.003 source (checked 3 Nov 2026). "Not published" means the brand page we checked doesn't list it, so we leave it blank rather than guess.

All the differences

Wrist fit

Lug-to-lug decides overhang more than diameter does. Enter your wrist to see how each one should wear.

  • Rolex Datejust 126334-0001 –
  • Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003 –

Same rule of thumb as Watch Finder: case diameter of about 23.5% of your wrist circumference (−2 mm to +2.5 mm), and lug-to-lug no longer than about 29% of it plus 1 mm. A guide, not a rule; flat or round wrists differ.

Strap fit

Rolex doesn't publish the lug width of the Rolex Datejust 126334-0001, so measure it before buying a strap. The Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003 has 20 mm lugs. Size charts: Rolex size chart · Omega lug width chart.

Which should you buy?

Smaller wristsRolex Datejust 126334-0001

It is the more compact case on paper (41 mm across). Our sizing guide puts it at about 16.4–18.3 cm.

Lower budgetOmega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003

It has the lower US list price, $6,700, a $4,950 difference.

Swimming and divingOmega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003

It has the higher water-resistance rating: 150 m vs 100 m.

Leaving it off for a weekendRolex Datejust 126334-0001

It has the longer published power reserve: 70 h.

Prices and where to buy

Rolex Datejust 126334-0001$11,650 (US list)Search AmazonFull specs
Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003$6,700 (US list)Search AmazonFull specs

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Amazon links are paid links. How we make money.

More: All Rolex Datejust references · All Omega Seamaster references.

Questions

Which is bigger, the Rolex Datejust 126334-0001 or the Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003?

Per the brands, the Rolex Datejust 126334-0001 is 41 mm across and the Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003 is 41 mm.

Which is cheaper?

The Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003, at a US list price of $6,700 vs $11,650 when we checked.

Which is more water-resistant?

Rolex Datejust 126334-0001: 100 m. Omega Aqua Terra 220.13.41.21.03.003: 150 m.

Have you tested these watches?

No. This comparison uses brand-published specs and our own analysis of them, not hands-on testing.

Not sure? Try Watch Finder →

Watch.co is independent and not affiliated with any brand. We haven't handled these watches for this page: everything here comes from brand-published specs and our own analysis. Brand names are used only to identify products.