Watch.co
Comparison · updated November 2026

Omega Constellation vs Rolex Datejust 36

Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001 vs Rolex Datejust 126231-0017, compared on the specs each brand publishes.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Picks and verdicts come from brand-published specs, not paid placement. How we make money.

The short answer

Two dressy everyday watches with integrated-look bracelets, compared on published specs.

  • Case size: the Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001 is 3 mm larger (39 mm vs 36 mm).
  • Water resistance: the Rolex Datejust 126231-0017 is 50 m more (100 m vs 50 m).
  • Power reserve: the Rolex Datejust 126231-0017 is 15 hours longer (70 h vs 55 h).
  • Price: the Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001 lists for $8,850 less in the US ($7,400 vs $16,250).
  • Calibre: Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001 has Omega 8800; Rolex Datejust 126231-0017 has 3235.

Side-by-side specs

Omega Constellation vs Rolex Datejust 36: specs side by side
SpecOmega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001Rolex Datejust 126231-0017
Case diameter39 mm36 mm
Thickness12.43 mmNot published by Rolex
Lug-to-lug41 mmNot published by Rolex
CalibreOmega 88003235
MovementAutomaticAutomatic
Power reserve55 h70 h
Water resistance50 m100 m
CrystalSapphireSapphire
Case materialStainless steelSteel and gold
Ships onBraceletBracelet
Weight158 gNot published by Rolex
US list price$7,400 (US list)$16,250 (US list)
DialSilverWhite
CertificationMETAS Master ChronometerCOSC chronometer (Rolex Superlative Chronometer)
StatusIn productionIn production
Suits wrists of about
our sizing guide
15.5–17.4 cm14.3–16.2 cm

Specs summarised in our own words from the brand's product pages: 131.10.39.20.02.001 source (checked 3 Nov 2026) 126231-0017 source (checked 3 Nov 2026). "Not published" means the brand page we checked doesn't list it, so we leave it blank rather than guess.

All the differences

Wrist fit

Lug-to-lug decides overhang more than diameter does. Enter your wrist to see how each one should wear.

  • Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001 –
  • Rolex Datejust 126231-0017 –

Same rule of thumb as Watch Finder: case diameter of about 23.5% of your wrist circumference (−2 mm to +2.5 mm), and lug-to-lug no longer than about 29% of it plus 1 mm. A guide, not a rule; flat or round wrists differ.

Which should you buy?

Smaller wristsRolex Datejust 126231-0017

It is the more compact case on paper (36 mm across). Our sizing guide puts it at about 14.3–16.2 cm.

Lower budgetOmega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001

It has the lower US list price, $7,400, a $8,850 difference.

Swimming and divingRolex Datejust 126231-0017

It has the higher water-resistance rating: 100 m vs 50 m.

Leaving it off for a weekendRolex Datejust 126231-0017

It has the longer published power reserve: 70 h.

Prices and where to buy

Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001$7,400 (US list)Search AmazonFull specs
Rolex Datejust 126231-0017$16,250 (US list)Search AmazonFull specs

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Amazon links are paid links. How we make money.

More: All Omega Constellation references · All Rolex Datejust references.

Questions

Which is bigger, the Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001 or the Rolex Datejust 126231-0017?

Per the brands, the Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001 is 39 mm across and the Rolex Datejust 126231-0017 is 36 mm.

Which is cheaper?

The Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001, at a US list price of $7,400 vs $16,250 when we checked.

Which is more water-resistant?

Omega Constellation 131.10.39.20.02.001: 50 m. Rolex Datejust 126231-0017: 100 m.

Have you tested these watches?

No. This comparison uses brand-published specs and our own analysis of them, not hands-on testing.

Not sure? Try Watch Finder →

Watch.co is independent and not affiliated with any brand. We haven't handled these watches for this page: everything here comes from brand-published specs and our own analysis. Brand names are used only to identify products.